![](/news/x.gif) | | Take a wish and I will possibly submit your part.
|
|
On the 1st of November I did a "quick build" (see (URL) and (URL) for reference). It was fun and I like to continue with this kind of authoring. I am open for (all) your wishes. First come, first served. (14 years ago, 17-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: bush lock primitives, 16 segment and inner edges.
|
|
(...) There's still the question of the interior edges though. Should they be removed or left as if? Also some of these could benefit from use of subparts, a common subpart for both 4273a and 4273b then another subpart to be used by 6577 and 4265a. (...) (14 years ago, 14-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: bush lock primitives, 16 segment and inner edges.
|
|
(...) I agree with what you have done to adjust bushloc2 and bushloc3 to fit 16-segment polygons: (URL) primtives is usually quite a challenge for the parts update process because all the affected parts need to be re-issued at the same time as the (...) (14 years ago, 8-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
![](/news/x.gif) | | bush lock primitives, 16 segment and inner edges.
|
|
The current bushloc primitives are divided into 32 segments where as most of the normal round type primitives are divided int 16 segments. Having noticed this I uploaded new versions of bushloc2 and bushloc3. Then I looked at some of the parts where (...) (14 years ago, 6-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: 6023.dat
|
|
(...) No worries. The good thing is that it has gotten me started on LDraw again, after some months in a state of Dark Ages Light. (...) Yes, so I noticed. Who knows, maybe the site admins have been experimenting on some improvements of the postig (...) (14 years ago, 3-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|