![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Fixing the liftarms
|
|
(...) Excellent Willy. That's awesome. I still hate the names but at least they're consistent. Tim (15 years ago, 21-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Fixing the liftarms
|
|
(...) When I standardized the headers of the certified parts at the PT back in August 2008 I tried to rename them as following: "1 x 1" are called Beams example: (URL) X 0.5" are called liftarm example: (URL) aware that only certified parts apply to (...) (15 years ago, 20-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
![](/news/x.gif) | | Fixing the liftarms
|
|
Hi all (and especially Chris Dee), I find the inconsistency in the naming of liftarms in LDraw to be quite frustrating and was wondering whether or not it would be worth setting a standard name class and sticking to it. Here's a sample list: Technic (...) (15 years ago, 20-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
(...) Thanks. 30172.dat and 47847.dat will be posted soon, 30135 a bit later. Philo (15 years ago, 8-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
(...) Philo, I added the submission dates to the chart. Pick it from the list. w. (15 years ago, 8-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|