 | | Re: have these pieces been CADed?
|
|
(...) It's worth noting that the parts aren't certified yet, and in fact have a hold vote in their common sub-file. So if the next official update is soon, then it's probably unlikely that these parts will be in it. --Travis (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: have these pieces been CADed?
|
|
(...) No, the primary PT admin (Chris Dee) has been off on holiday until recently. -Orion (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: have these pieces been CADed?
|
|
Let's just hope that not too much time and energy goes into this 'steering committee election thingy... (URL) (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: have these pieces been CADed?
|
|
(...) Read this: (URL) Niels (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: have these pieces been CADed?
|
|
(...) (URL) good right link>. (URL) good left link> (...) thanks! any idea when they'll be official? i figured they were by now & i just didn't get the update. also, any idea when the next official update will be on Ldraw? Jeff (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: have these pieces been CADed?
|
|
(...) Mmhhh... bad link for left part. Here is the good one: (URL) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: have these pieces been CADed?
|
|
Should be: (URL) left> and (URL) right>. Oops! :) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: have these pieces been CADed?
|
|
(URL) left> and (URL) right>. (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | have these pieces been CADed?
|
|
i can't seem to find files for these on LDraw, Peeron, or on the reference pages here @ LUGnet. (2 URLs) Jeff (not Lcad experinced to draw either) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Type numbering of parts with different types
|
|
(...) Well, first off, using 'Type X' should be the notation of last resort. The prefered way to note variations of parts is to include a descriptive notation. Sometimes, a descriptive notation is not practical (for whatever reasons). In this case, (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
