 | | Re: have these pieces been CADed?
|
|
(...) Mmhhh... bad link for left part. Here is the good one: (URL) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: have these pieces been CADed?
|
|
Should be: (URL) left> and (URL) right>. Oops! :) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: have these pieces been CADed?
|
|
(URL) left> and (URL) right>. (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | have these pieces been CADed?
|
|
i can't seem to find files for these on LDraw, Peeron, or on the reference pages here @ LUGnet. (2 URLs) Jeff (not Lcad experinced to draw either) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Type numbering of parts with different types
|
|
(...) Well, first off, using 'Type X' should be the notation of last resort. The prefered way to note variations of parts is to include a descriptive notation. Sometimes, a descriptive notation is not practical (for whatever reasons). In this case, (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
