 | | Re: Link to reference, please!
|
|
(...) Done. Any other primitives references that should be linked in? Hmm. Paul Easter's primitive generator, at least. What else? Steve (20 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Part request: Cone 4 x 4 x 3 [DAT]
|
|
(...) I've got one of those from that set. Here's a hideous unofficial mock-up of the part. The inside has one big tube like the 4742 and a few ridges, but I didn't model them because I'm a lousy part maker. 0 Cone 4 x 4 x 3 0 Name: x483.dat 0 (...) (20 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Link to reference, please!
|
|
(...) It took several minutes to find it. This is the link I mean: (URL) (20 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Link to reference, please!
|
|
I think it would be a great idea to put a link to the primitives reference that is somewhere on lugnet or ldraw.org at the web interface page of this group. ( (URL) ) (20 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Part request: Cone 4 x 4 x 3
|
|
Ooooh! Also me wanna :) I built this set some time ago and had to cheat a little.... (URL) (20 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part request: Cone 4 x 4 x 3
|
|
(...) I made a dat file of that cone once. If only I knew where I stored it... /Tore (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part request: Cone 4 x 4 x 3
|
|
As I was building set 358 Rocket Base in MLCad I noticed that the Cone 4 x 4 x 3 ((URL) does not exist, not even on the PT. I also want to build trainset 725 in MLCad, which also uses this cone. As I don't own this part myself I can not create it. (...) (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
Just a post to say I'm working on this. William (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterns suck!
|
|
(...) IMHO a mosaic can't replace true vectors or poligons. regardless of the resolution you will still need an obcene amount of quads to define the shapes. it won't be the giant leap but it would be the small step if the LSC could with a new (...) (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Patterns, simplified
|
|
(...) I'm inferring that you are talking about converting a scanned image into a pattered subfile for a part? Then, optimally, the process requires the following discrete phases: 1) Someone[1] scans a patterned part at high resolution into an agreed (...) (20 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
