 | | I can't load my new files...
|
|
...Because someone took my part numbers. Well over a year ago (closer to two years ago, if memory serves), I was given the range of x460 through x489 for any LDraw file I wrote whose part number I didn't know. (These are called "temporary part (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) OK, I see the problem. (...) This is a good idea. So I would agree with that. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 20-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) I'm inclined to agree, as I have been struggling with this conceptual problem, since borrowing a selection of Modulex with the intention of authoring some parts for LDraw. Are there any Modulex parts that _do_ actually bind with regular LEGO? (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) Have you really considered the consequenses when modelling? It will be almost impossible to calculate the positions of the parts. Or at least very, very time consuming. /Tore (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) I think the scale of Modulex parts should hardcoded (62.5% of normal size in dat-code). No separation. So it has the same norm as the "normal" Lego parts (1 mm = 2.5 LDU). CU Bernd (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) Sorry, wrong ng... :) FOT: lugnet.cad.dat.parts (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) Thanks for doing the research. As a result, I think "Chin Guard" is preferable. Chris (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
<all the stuff I agree with snipped, leaving only the trivial> (...) I agree with the idea, but is "Chin-Guard" a standard word? It's not in either dictionary.com or m-w.com (I really need to get my books out of storage. . .) and a Google search on (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I can go along with that! ;) (Good catch, by the way! ;) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I agree and prefer Chin-guard too. (...) Doh - no, of course not. I meant 193a : Minifig Helmet Classic with Thin Chin-guard 193b : Minifig Helmet Classic with Thick Chin-guard (...) Chris (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
