 | | Re: New part: x211.dat - Door 1 x 4 x 5 with 3 Panes
|
|
(...) It *used* to be 39. Now, it's 47. Steve (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New primitive: Ring 2 Small Hole [DAT]
|
|
(...) I didn't know this. Thanks for explain! (...) I used the ring1 to construct the ring: 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 ring1.dat 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 ring2.dat because if I scale down the ring2.dat, the thickness of the border will be 1/2, (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 2618.dat Auqanaut Bubble Base (Updated)
|
|
oh shoot, thanks for pointing that out for me Burkhard. I concentrated so much on getting them in the part, I didn't even notice that they stick above. 2 quick fixes on the way. Also what's the standard for orientation, so I get it right In my next (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 2618.dat Auqanaut Bubble Base (Updated)
|
|
(...) It's not just you. :) Steve (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about a new kind of stud
|
|
(...) I replied to your posting of the ring file. (...) Good question. :) (...) Since it is a stud, I'd say you should post stud9.dat as a primitive. But replace ring2a.dat with the two-line construction I posted in my earlier message. Also, if you (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
