 | | Re: Revised Arched Latticed WIndow Pane
|
|
(...) No problem, you're welcome. (...) I'm certain it will be. (...) Yeah, well... :-) a) I overstated things just a _bit_ to Todd. I *have* all but stopped reading LUGNET unless and until there's a new vote in which case Terry wakes me up and (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Revised Arched Latticed WIndow Pane
|
|
Hi Joshua, (...) Thanks for the information. I've submitted it to Terry, hopefully it will be in the next vote. Adam PS. Glad to have you back :) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Revised Arched Latticed WIndow Pane
|
|
Adam Howard wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Traditional procedure would be to submit to Terry, and let the Numbers Group provide the number (if possible). -- joshua (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: final version of the baseplate 32 x 32 raised with ramp
|
|
i am saying that i have fixed every single problem that i can find with the piece including the ones pointed out to me. the only known issue with the piece is the rounded edged and i have been told that i do not have to do those (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: final version of the baseplate 32 x 32 raised with ramp
|
|
(...) Jonathan, Does "I hope they have all been fixed" mean: (a) you're uncertain whether you have actually fixed the problems that people pointed out to you; or (b) you're hoping other people will continue to do your work for you, and point out (...) (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: UN-Official Part: Technic Pneumatic Airtank
|
|
Since posting this part, I have discovered two errors in the file: In line number 557, there was a line with a zero and nothing more. This line has been removed. L3P complained about "singular matrix" in the lines containing the "1-4RIN10.DAT" (...) (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: UN-Official Part: Technic Pneumatic Airtank
|
|
looks great. now we need the t-junction and valve (i have mock-ups of the cyklinders) (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | UN-Official Part: Technic Pneumatic Airtank [DAT]
|
|
Hi, I have just completed the Technic Pneumatic Airtank. It is centered in the origin, and rotated along the X-axis. The part isn't perfect. E.g. the position of the "nozzles" is quite hard to figure out even when holding the tank in my hands, but (...) (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | final version of the baseplate 32 x 32 raised with ramp [DAT]
|
|
here is the final version of the baseplate 32 cx 32 raised with ramp part. it has been sent to tery and if the part is approved this is the version that should appear in the update. thanks for the information on the problems with this part. i hope (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6056 - Brick 2 x 2 x 6 with Groove
|
|
Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message news:FFy9q9.AJF@lugnet.com... (...) underside-studs, (...) if (...) stud. If (...) at (...) I think you should put the hole in. I was going to start work on this after working on another part and I (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6056 - Brick 2 x 2 x 6 with Groove
|
|
(...) Good. A stud primitive wouldn't work there because it is only half a stud. If you get a chance to render it, you'll see what I mean. You can also look at part 4216, as it has the same underside. (...) Hmmm... I guess I could go with this then: (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6056 - Brick 2 x 2 x 6 with Groove
|
|
you little beuty. just the part i needed to finish my black knights castle. now if you can do the large size castle wall corner then my royal knights castle would be complete as well. (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6056 - Brick 2 x 2 x 6 with Groove
|
|
(...) I haven't looked at the part yet, if you mean one of those underside-studs, such as are found in 1x plates, the hole doesn't need to be there. And if you didn't use the appropriate stud primitive for that part of the part, you should have. (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 6056 - Brick 2 x 2 x 6 with Groove [DAT]
|
|
This is my second part, the 2x2x6 Brick with groove. One thing I didn't model on this part was the small hole in the bottom half-stud. Is this okay, or should it be there? Anyways, Please let me know what you think (about the baseplate, too)! Jeff (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Brick 1 x 6 with Canada Post Pattern [DAT]
|
|
Hi! This is my first part, so please bear with me If I have made any mistakes. I believe that this piece only came in one set, number 105. (See (URL) ) If you have any comments or criticism please reply. --Calvin _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Baseplate 32 x 32 Raised with Ramp (fixed version)
|
|
i can fix this (if i remember). (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Baseplate 32 x 32 Raised with Ramp (fixed version)
|
|
(...) Thank you! One more thing: There is a line hanging off the bottom. You can see it if you look at from the side. Jeff (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Baseplate 32 x 32 Raised with Ramp (fixed version) [DAT]
|
|
this fixes the 2 problems that jeff pointed out. i will make sure that it ends up in the update if the part is approved. 0 Baseplate 32 x 32 Raised with Ramp (needs work) 0 Name: 2552.dat 0 Author: Jonathan Wilson 0 Un-Official Element 1 16 300 0 (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6261 Baseplate 32 x 48 Raised Ramp & Pit Plate
|
|
you little beuty. now all i need is the large size castle wall and i can ldraw 6090 royal knights castle. it also will come in handy for my fortress i am making. (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive Re-submission
|
|
Before anyone notices (I forgot to change part of the subject :) There is no new primitive in this part. I scrapped it after discussing the part with Steve Bliss. Thanks Steve, Adam (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
