Subject:
|
Re: PentWing Fighter, Version II
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.models
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 02:39:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
905 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.models, Bram Lambrecht writes:
> "John VanZwieten" <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> writes:
> > Now those wings have a reason for being! And they look great.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I like the new wings better too (although I
> only built one. Maybe I'll tackle the other four later.)
>
> > I have to say I liked your earlier cockpit better.
>
> I thought the first one was a bit bland. I *think* I like the new one,
> but I'm not sure. Seems to me that it has more character than the first
> version.
>
> > Either way, though, the concept and overall design of this
> > ship is wonderful.
>
> Glad you like it! What do you think of the new name? Is Pentapterigoid
> better than PentWing?
> --Bram
Hmmm... Pentapterigoid doesn't flow off the tongue very well. While
PentWing is good, I think it also needs a more menacing name.
Legotaku Jeff
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: PentWing Fighter, Version II
|
| (...) Thanks for the suggestion. I like the new wings better too (although I only built one. Maybe I'll tackle the other four later.) (...) I thought the first one was a bit bland. I *think* I like the new one, but I'm not sure. Seems to me that it (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
