 | | Re: Modern Police Department —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) I didn't think Datsville was about claiming precendence for stuff. I thought it was about a shared experiment in creating a world... What's the harm in having two police stations and more equipment than just what you did? Else I coud claim (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Modern Police Department —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:37F7A09F.2DB200...ger.net... (...) Yes, and it's about a creative way to show off lots of different creations. (...) Every quality .dat should eventually make it into Datsville. Some (...) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Modern Police Department —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | (...) Well, actually, State police wouldn't have jurisdiction in Datsville. It could be in the suburbs or outside the city limits, though. :) Oh, and I'd suggest it be county police, not state police. Alternately, since all large cities have (...) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Modern Police Department —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message news:FJ3EK3.3pp@lugnet.com... (...) But (...) could (...) suggest (...) At least in Illinios, State Police have police jurisdiction everywhere. Here in Springfield, we have city, county, and state (...) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| | | | |
