|
|
 | | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
| (...) Try viewing it with LDLite or L3Lab. The minifig was made using LDao's Minifig Modeler, which spits out code with LDLite language extensions. MLCAD and L3P don't recognize the LDLite commands, so they render incorrectly. BTW: the newest (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| | | | | Arm size an issue? (Was: YAL: Yet Another Loader :))
|
| (...) LOL -- Barbara's first words after seeing my loader were, "it's a crab? no, is it a gorilla?" I think that means the arms were too big. :-, (...) Yah, it does seem silly to put such large arms on a walking loader. The arms I put on mine, and (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
| I love the loader, but the minifig seems to hav had a melt down. When I load it into mlcad, or convert it with L3P, the minifig parts are all stacked on top of each other like they were not transformed or rotated. Is anyone else seing this? -Chuck (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| | | | | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
| (...) I like it. Love the legs, love the rollbars. And, given a powerful enough auto-balancing system, it looks like it could do a mean sprint. ;-) Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| | | | | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
| I think I'd have to disagree with you Mladen. If those were pneumatic or hydraulically driven arms or forks like on a fork lift, they'd probably be plenty strong. Anything bigger, while perhaps more aesthetically pleasing, would most likely leave (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
|
