 | | Dump Body for mine truck —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | Here's the dump body I'm talking about in .general --Bram 0 Dump Body 0 Name: dumpbody.dat 0 Author: Bram Lambrecht <blambrec@student.chuh.org> 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4282.DAT 1 0 0 0 80 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4282.DAT 1 0 0 0 160 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 (...) (25 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Dump Body for mine truck —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | Hmm. Seems kind of ... small ... Maybe it's how shallow it is. But I like it. Mounting the front lip plates sideways into the 1x2 with top rods (or whatever that rollbar piece is called, I forget)! Now that is a neat idea! Cool. (25 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Dump Body for mine truck —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | (...) Aren't you the one who can't stand talk of eight-wide trains? Then why are you calling this small? :) Seriously, I think the vertical parts are the right height, but maybe the bottom isn't flat like I built it (ie, angled like you said you (...) (25 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Dump Body for mine truck —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Because this behemoth is 50 feet wide in real life. Trains are about 10 or 12. :-) Foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds. And my mind is anything but small (or is that my head, I forget...). (25 years ago, 30-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
| | | | |
