 | | Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel.
|
|
(...) Wouldn't it be best to create 'inventorying policy'? Inventorying is much faster than actually modelling the parts, so the {ldraw} part library is {in my eyes} just a subset of peeron library. And while you think about some new policies, some (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel.
|
|
(...) There is a logic to Niels' xNNN numbers and although this has been explained several times before, it probably deserves repeating. The LDraw convention for part numbers (initiated by James Jessiman) is to use 3-digit part numbers where the (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel.
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Hello Niels, (...) ldraw failed. Then I had a three weeks vacation without online access. Now I uploaded them at brickshelf to publish them. :-( (...) these (even if I think mine are more accurately done).... (...) I had a close (...) (22 years ago, 22-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: parts i'd like to see in Lcad/MLcad
|
|
(...) After a long delay I finally got back to these parts. I've post completed version on the PT. -Orion (22 years ago, 22-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Sub-part numbers for Monorail Point/Switch Right
|
|
(...) Well this is a problem. But it could occure to more "old" DAT-files. (...) I could live with that. And I also think a "go left/right" and a "go straight" Shortcut _is_ needed. CU bernd (22 years ago, 22-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
