 | | Re: New Primitive Class
|
| (...) I'm not terribly surprised. This is a great solution, as then, if for some reason in the future, inverse ratio tori are needed, they can use the same convention, just a different starting letter and inverting the ratio as appropriate in the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: New Primitive Class
|
| (...) You might be surprised at how close t04o9999.dat would come. I can't see that it's any worse than the current t04o3333.dat file. Actually, I think I'm going to modify LDView to recognize nnnn in the minor fraction (where n is 0-9) to be (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | New Primitive Class
|
| Actually, it's not a new primitive, but it doesn't fit under the current naming scheme. My current 33089 (in PT) is a rather bulky file (55KB), so to streamline it, I decided to make a few new primitives. One of these was a torus with major radius 1 (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat?
|
| (...) I think I agree with that. Actually, I could go either way. (...) Right. (...) I'm opposed to allowing additional comments between INVERTNEXT and the statements it affects -- one program's 'comment' is another program's 'meta-statement'. OTOH, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Part 892 [DAT]
|
| Hi, my name is Johan Vettefors and I've been lurking around here for some time. I have a question about the ldraw library. The part 892.dat which the tringle with clip in for example the lego sets speeder bikes and naboo swamp is NOT identical to (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
