 | | Re: Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
(...) I think having the interior open would be a good thing for this part. However, we're rapidly approaching 1000 files backlogged on the Tracker. So I'm getting more willing to let stuff through that can be improved later. Steve (24 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | m889.ldr [DAT]
|
|
Since my first one went up intact... 0 889 Radar Truck 0 WRITE Name: m889.ldr 0 WRITE Author: John Riley <Rohnjiley@yahoo.com> 0 WRITE LDraw.org Official Model Repository 0 Official Model: ©1979 LEGO Group 0 ROTATION CENTER 71.2128 -54 -10 1 (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | m886.ldr PLUS I finally delurk [DAT]
|
|
Hello all, Now seems to be a good time to delurk. I am a graduate student, and thus don't have the time or money to really get into building. My current LEGO time is spent by digitizing the instructions from my golden lego years before they're lost (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | Re: Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
(...) There was this unofficial generic rule that details smaller than 1 LDU may be omitted. I don't know if it is still valid. Another good rule, always valid, is common sense... :o) /Tore (24 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
I have a problem with the part Technic Pneumatic T Piece (URL) have two options - modelling a very accurate part, with inner details, but for this would produce a part with less standard primitives cylinder or sphere. - using as many as possible (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
