 | | Re: New Part, 99% done: 6203.dat - Container ???
|
|
(...) OK, I submitted the 1-4 ring files to the Parts Tracker. They're at: (URL) about my earlier lack of understanding of the problem with the current x-4cyli files. My bad. :/ Steve (25 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part, 99% done: 6203.dat - Container ???
|
|
(...) It took me a minute to grok what you were saying. The 'test line' is inaccurate for anything except joining one half-cylinder to another. (...) We could push the cylinder polygons into one file, the final edge-line into another file, and (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part, 99% done: 6203.dat - Container ???
|
|
(...) Yes, please do. I think the 1-4 are more general than 2-4, but it's up to you. /Tore (25 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part, 99% done: 6203.dat - Container ???
|
|
(...) I'm not sure where to go with this one. Generally, parts like this go into Minifig Accessory. But this part isn't exactly minifig scale. Hmm. (...) I don't think so. Typical primitive files only have an optional line at one end. Check out this (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part, 99% done: 6203.dat - Container ???
|
|
(...) I agree. I think the problem is that the current half cylinder primitives expect to be mated with other cylinder primitives to create a whole cylinder. Connect edge A with optional line to edge B without optional line. But connect edge A to (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
