 | | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
| (...) Well... imho this should not be an issue at all - if the parts tracker was updated! Philo (17 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
| (...) These truncated filenames never went past the LSC, and as such should probably be held. I personally feel that they are inappropriate, but whether or not I think they are appropriate, I believe that it's the LSC's job to determine that. (...) (17 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
| Hi Steve, (...) One reason: the Parts Tracker still doesn't like >8 names :( Philo (17 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
| (...) I ditto Phillippe's primary suggestion: use multiple files. It's good for multiple reasons. However, the current standards allow at least 25 characters in the filename, so is there a reason to worry about a 9 character primitive name? Steve (17 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
| (...) I would suggest avoiding the problem completely by using a 2-4edge + 3-16edge... In other instances the name was shortened: 3-16cone19 --> 3-16co19 11-48ring19 --> 11-48r19 Philo (17 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
