Subject:
|
Re: Questions about existing parts (making BFC)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 15:11:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
543 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Niels Karsdorp wrote:
> After being out of buissiness for a while I continued to
> make existing parts bfc compliant.
>
> Are all primitives already bfc compliant?
No, but any new primitives or fixed primitives should be BFC'ed.
> I thought someone was working on that, so I dont want to
> spend time to do that over again.
> Some primitives i have non bfc (only official updates):
> * 2-8sphe
> * 4-8sphe
> * 2-4ring1
> * stud3a
> * arm1
Of these, I think the only one we don't have a BFC'ed version of is
arm1.
> I have done the parts between 600 and 6099.
> I'll fix errors in the parts when possible.
> Some parts I have skipped:
> 600 Notch in door should be modelled in 3D (I don't have this part)
> 6058 Missing lots of lines and polygons
> 6063 Many overlapping polygons
> 6099p03 Incorrect pattern (or are there 2 versions?)
I'll look forward to seeing these.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Questions about existing parts (making BFC)
|
| After being out of buissiness for a while I continued to make existing parts bfc compliant. Are all primitives already bfc compliant? I thought someone was working on that, so I dont want to spend time to do that over again. Some primitives i have (...) (22 years ago, 6-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
