Special:
|
[DAT] (requires LDraw-compatible viewer)
|
Subject:
|
Re: Technic angle connector angles
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Oct 1998 14:04:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1511 times
|
| |
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> writes:
> But, but. I still noticed that the 925 and 32015 were in fact
> different. At least I think I did. The 32015 had a somewhat smaller
> angle, probably around 113°. So I was wondering what the actual angle
> is, so that I can use the piece in my models.
Well, I think I came up with the answer myself. Peeking into 32015.dat,
I found
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -0.38 0.92 0 -0.92 -0.38 s\921b.dat
Now, using R, I find that
> acos(-.38)/pi*360/2 • [1] 112.3337
> 90+acos(.92)/pi*360/2
[1] 113.0739
So 113° would probably be the correct angle.
Fredrik
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Technic angle connector angles
|
| (...) Oh, sorry. Well, I just had to have the parts before they became official, I guess. (...) But, but. I still noticed that the 925 and 32015 were in fact different. At least I think I did. The 32015 had a somewhat smaller angle, probably around (...) (26 years ago, 19-Oct-98, to lugnet.cad)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
