To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 101
100  |  102
Subject: 
Re: Technic angle connector angles
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Tue, 20 Oct 1998 05:36:57 GMT
Viewed: 
3352 times
  
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998 12:18:40 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve
Bliss) wrote:

> Once upon a time, Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no>
> wrote:
> 
> > I just noticed that there are two versions of the technic angle
> > connector #5 in LDraw,
> > 
> > 32015.DAT     Technic Angle Connector #5
> > 925.DAT       Technic Angle Connector #5 120 Deg.
> > 
> > These have different angles, so I wonder: Which one is correct, and what
> > is the correct angle?
> 
> Drawing upon my hazy memories, I seem to remember that Lutz's first
> version of the 925 had the wrong angle.  But he fixed & re-released it
> (I think).  Also, thinking about the what the correct angles should be
> for all the angle connectors, they are evenly-angled going from
> 90-degrees to 180-degrees, with 5 possible angles. I know this because
> they duplicate the possible positions from the older toothed angle
> connectors, LDraw part #4273.  So the correct angles should be:
> 
> 90
> 112.5
> 135
> 157.5
> 180
> 
> Which means that the part with the 120-degree angle must be incorrect.
> 
> Steve

The question of angle accuracy is why I dropped that from the
description.  I figured the pieces are clearly marked, so that was all
that's needed.

-- Terry K --



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Technic angle connector angles
 
(...) True, but when you stack pieces on top of each other, you really need to know the angle, to be able to rotate the next pieces correctly. But then again, the 571.DAT Technic Liftarm 1 x 9 Bent Hasn't got the angle in the description, either. (...) (28 years ago, 20-Oct-98, to lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Technic angle connector angles
 
(...) Drawing upon my hazy memories, I seem to remember that Lutz's first version of the 925 had the wrong angle. But he fixed & re-released it (I think). Also, thinking about the what the correct angles should be for all the angle connectors, they (...) (28 years ago, 19-Oct-98, to lugnet.cad)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR