Subject:
|
Re: Proposed solution for Building Instruction scale issue
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 23:47:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
838 times
|
| |
|
|
Kevin,
Overall, I think the more well thought out and defined controls there are
the better the tool. And I wanted to take this oppertunity to thank you for
having this open dialog, it is very reasuring and likely to produce a more
robust tool in the end!
I didn't mean to contradict myself. :) What I ment was that if I needed 2 or
3 differnet resolutions than I would simply rerun the application 2 or 3
time to achieve them; for each using a differnt final image size. Thus if
all the images were scaled with a constant scale factor in the layout
application the apperant size would be different.
SteveB
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Proposed solution for Building Instruction scale issue
|
| (...) You are welcome. Is there going to be an end? I've done enough applications in my life to know that my own philosphic perspectives on what makes a great tool are not as strong as the group philosphy. As the implementor of the tool, I only use (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Proposed solution for Building Instruction scale issue
|
| (...) Rather have a single solution path unless there is a *really* compelling reason to do otherwise. LPub is quite quick with its part of the job, but there is overhead in running L3P so many times. (...) Scale changing within a given sequence of (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
