Subject:
|
Re: LeoCAM alpha release
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:47:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1055 times
|
| |
|
|
Wayne Gramlich wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Gustavo Patow writes:
> I grabbed the binary zip, unpacked it, and then noticed that it
> was Windows.
To be fair, Gustavo noted that in his announcement.
> I grabbed the source and attempted to compile them under a
> stock Red Hat 7.3 distribution of Linux. Here are my notes; I hope
> you find them useful. All in all, I thought there were very few
> problems, concidering this is an `alpha'.
Nice to hear that you got time to go as far as to try to
compile the program. Have you made a patch and sent it
directly to Gustavo (or to his student doing the actual coding)?
I suspect that there will be more problems than what you
have found. IIRC LeoCAD/LeoCAM uses different GUI libraries
for Linux and MS-Windows. This could mean that there are
lots of GUI code that has to be reimplemented in the Linux
specific parts of the source code.
Play well,
Jacob
--
City X'ers mail van (building instructions):
http://jacob.sparre.dk/CityXers/Postbil/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LeoCAM alpha release
|
| (...) [...] (...) Gustavo: I grabbed the binary zip, unpacked it, and then noticed that it was Windows. I kicked Windows out of my house about 5 years ago ;-) I grabbed the source and attempted to compile them under a stock Red Hat 7.3 distribution (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
