Subject:
|
Re: 3823.dat doesn't work well with P/48 primitives
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Oct 2002 02:55:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
474 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> Uh, you mean *ring* primitive, right? The lines you quoted are all
> *flat*.
Yeah, Sorry, I meant ring. I actually wrote ring the first time then
changed it. I guess I should stop thinking so much :)
> I would not use 48 segment primitives on this part - it would be
> overkill.
Well, I just have the search path in my program setup to search 'p/48'
before it searches 'p' so I'm picking them up automatically. I would
think that we'd want to be able to do that when ever possible, no?
I aggree that zoomed out to see a whole model, using these primitives
may not make much difference, but I'll tell you zoomed in on this one
part, man, it sure does look sweet!
>
> There do seem to be some incorrect vertices on those polygons. You
> could replace the polygons with the following:
I didn't include all the polygons... Did you look through the file?
>
> 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1-4ring3.dat
> 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1-4ring4.dat
> (except with the correct positioning and orientation).
>
OK. Cool. I'll see what I can do.
-kyle
--
_
-------------------------------ooO( )Ooo-------------------------------
Kyle J. McDonald (o o) Systems Support Engineer
Sun Microsystems Inc. |||||
Enterprise Server Products Kyle.McDonald@Sun.COM
1 Network Drive BUR03-4630 \\\// voice: (781) 442-2184
Burlington, MA 01803 (o o) fax: (781) 442-1542
-------------------------------ooO(_)Ooo-------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 3823.dat doesn't work well with P/48 primitives
|
| (...) I've gotten this to work, but I'm curious about this as a special case. With the primitives above, I can rotate them about their Y axis to orient them correctly, *or* I can mirror or reflect them across their X and Z axes, to 'flip' them into (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 3823.dat doesn't work well with P/48 primitives [DAT]
|
| (...) Uh, you mean *ring* primitive, right? The lines you quoted are all *flat*. I would not use 48 segment primitives on this part - it would be overkill. There do seem to be some incorrect vertices on those polygons. You could replace the polygons (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
