 | | Re: Technic angle connector angles —Terry Keller
| | | | (...) Ah, I see you have been keeping "unofficial" parts. The 925 is the original part submitted for voting. Later, we found the correct TLG part number, 32015, and I simplified the description. So the 32015 is the "official" part released in the (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Technic angle connector angles —Fredrik Glöckner
| | | | | | (...) Oh, sorry. Well, I just had to have the parts before they became official, I guess. (...) But, but. I still noticed that the 925 and 32015 were in fact different. At least I think I did. The 32015 had a somewhat smaller angle, probably around (...) (26 years ago, 19-Oct-98, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Technic angle connector angles —Fredrik Glöckner
| | | | | | | (...) Well, I think I came up with the answer myself. Peeking into 32015.dat, I found 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -0.38 0.92 0 -0.92 -0.38 s\921b.dat Now, using R, I find that (...) [1] 112.3337 (...) [1] 113.0739 So 113° would probably be the correct angle. (...) (26 years ago, 19-Oct-98, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Technic angle connector angles —Chris Moseley
| | | | | Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> wrote (...) No, I use the toothed thingys to make them. And it's really annoying. So when I draw up the latest MTB models I'm going to include the #4 even though mine are faked. If they ever appear I suspect I'll be (...) (26 years ago, 19-Oct-98, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | |
