 | | Re: Modeling String —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Well I just slapped together a primitive to simulate twisted string bits but am not all that pleased with it. The string I have in mind to model will be so tight that a straight line will be fine, no need for catenary curves (although it sure (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Modeling String —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Perhaps we could also have parts, like the hose segments so you have a "String End" and "String section" (for want of better names). These could possibly be cylinders with a "wound" or "braided" pattern on them, the end section having 1 closed (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Modeling String —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | | (...) Incidentally, I have considered it. But so far I have concluded that the mathematics are too complicated for an analytical solution. And I am a bit tired of programming numerical optimalization.. Fredrik (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Modeling String —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) Nah, the .dat.* groups are for posting .DAT content and followup discussions. If you are going to post an example string element, the .dat.parts would probably be a good choice. Fredrik (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
