 | | Re: POV, LDLite and Perspective views —Paul Gyugyi
| | | | Wireframe is _much_ faster. About 70% of the time taken by ldlite for a model such as LL928 is spent filling in quads. However, wireframe gets messy after only a few bricks. I'm playing with ActiveX modellers, where you can move a slider bar and it (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: POV, LDLite and Perspective views —Karim Nassar
| | | | | (...) I''m not sure how you are doing the rendering, but what if only the active line (piece moved since last update) is done in wireframe... since that is the only piece "moving", if you don't have to redraw the whole rest of the model, it might (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: POV, LDLite and Perspective views —Jeff Boen
| | | | | | (...) good idea Karim, after all, that's how LEdit does it.. fully coloring all blocks up to the current cursor point, then wireframing the current piece... i like that idea.. J (26 years ago, 4-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: POV, LDLite and Perspective views —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) The big issue is redrawing just the part that has changed. It would be nice to wireframe or highlight the current piece as well, but the speed thing is for LDLite to discover (or be told) which part of the file needs redrawing. Actually, more (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | |
