Subject:
|
Re: Sorting parts by location
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 16:39:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
941 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.cad, Fredrik Glöckner writes:
> "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> writes:
>
> > If you have the formula for euclidian distance that would be great
> > too.
>
>
> Bram Lambrecht gave you the formula.
Whoops, duh. This thread didn't have any posts for a while and I missed all
the other ones, thought yours was the first!
> > I am using the approximation of taking the X Y anx Z values and
> > summing them. If the viewpoint is in the right place that's an
> > excellent approximation.
>
>
> That's probably good enough for some applications.
Seems to work for me for now. Mostly I am trying to get a rough ordering of
a large model so I can refine it to put the steps in the right order to
build it up back to front (viewed orthogonally) instead of in layers
Thanks.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Sorting parts by location
|
| (...) Bram Lambrecht gave you the formula. Depending on what you want to do and what kind of viewing transformation (if any) you are using, the euclidian distance _may_ be the wrong kind of measure to use. But it is probably an ok approximation... (...) (23 years ago, 28-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|