 | | Re: ldao 2.0.1 runtime error —John VanZwieten
|
| | | I'm sure it's hard to test without the benefit of many user's configurations and the different ways people use the program (which is a testament to its usefulness). What I have been doing is keeping two separate versions of LDAO installed: the (...) (26 years ago, 23-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: ldao 2.0.1 runtime error —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | (...) You too? :-) (...) That thread would get pretty big. (sorry Steve, I couldn't resist the jab) :-) -- Terry K -- (...) (26 years ago, 23-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: ldao 2.0.1 runtime error —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) I just keep the source code handy. Actually, I do keep two versions installed. But one is the latest published version, and the second is my most recent compile, which usually has fixes for the bugs in the published version. (...) Yeah^3. (26 years ago, 24-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: ldao 2.0.1 runtime error —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) How about if I just put a notice in the 'New Version Available' announcement: "post bug reports (and questions) as follow-up to this notice"? That's just one less thread to manage. Steve (26 years ago, 24-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
