 | | Is lugnet.cad Obsolete? (was: 6 wide auto carrier ...) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) Is it? Hmm. Let me see. Under CAD, we've got groups for: - posting DAT/MPD files - developers & developing (parts and software) Seems like there are a lot of other possible topics for LEGO CAD not covered by these two areas. What about people (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Is lugnet.cad Obsolete? (was: 6 wide auto carrier ...) —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | (...) Oops.. I forgot that cad.dat auto-redirected to cad. What I *meant* is cad.dat is obsolete. Sorry for any confusion! :) Jeff (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Is lugnet.cad Obsolete? (was: 6 wide auto carrier ...) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Oops. Sorry I jumped on it. Steve (25 years ago, 27-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Is lugnet.cad Obsolete? (was: 6 wide auto carrier ...) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Heh heh, oops! Actually, Jeff was referring to lugnet.cad.dat, Steve. :) Jeff wrote: (...) And he was talking about Thomas Burger's post to lugnet.cad.dat... Here's the thread: (URL) gotta figure out how to stop lugnet.cad.dat from receiving (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Is lugnet.cad Obsolete? —Thomas Burger
|
| | | | (...) thanks for the compliment. lugnet.cad is not dead. got parts requests there.. but cad.dat yes thats obsolete noone posts there. its all in models or models.sets (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
