 | | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) I haven't got a clue. Never heard of LGPL or CC before. But I would be very surprised if my terms is more restricted in any way. My terms are: use my exactly how you like to as long as I have the right to use them the way I like. (...) I guess (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) Well, the main difference (I think) is that if someone modifies a LGPL or CC work and distributes it on the Internet or something, he or she must also allow other people to do the same with their modified version. There are also some (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) Sorry. I just reread that and it's full of grammar mistakes. Mike (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) By no means worse than mine. I'll try to contact Martin Svensson (now Palmberg) about the Post office building. I'm certain he has no objections that we use his work. /Tore (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) Awesome! I'll try contacting some other people this evening. Mike (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) BTW, (URL) contains an updated version of my petrol station (I forget exactly how I made the stickers although they are copied of stickers from an official set) that was used when the petrol station was entered into (and won) the MOTM contest (...) (15 years ago, 24-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) Thanks. I've uploaded it to the repository. Unfortunately, the Shell logos are trademarked and may be unusable (rather un-relicens-able). Mike (15 years ago, 24-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) Or, "un-re-license-able". :) Mike (15 years ago, 24-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
