Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org 2009-02 Parts Update Now Available
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:55:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10770 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Allen Smith wrote:
> But are all the TLG colors expected to have analogs in the official
> ldconfig.ldr? In a short random sampling of colors I didn't recognize, I
> found a few that didn't appear to be (TLG\_Rose, TLG\_Cobalt\_Blue). I
> definitely want to make sure all of Lego's colors are represented in LDraw
> (but I also want maintain a one-to-one correspondence between colors and
> !COLOUR directives).
Hi Allen,
as pointed out here:
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=16368
we based the chart mainly on BL and Peeron and only those colors have been
matched against the TLG colors. The complete list of colors which didn't make
into the file are listed on the wiki:
http://www.ldraw.org/wiki/index.php/LDConfig.ldr
It didn't make much sense to us create colors in LDraw which can be bought/build
in RL.
w.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LDraw.org 2009-02 Parts Update Now Available
|
| (...) Thanks for clarifying, Willy. I had not understood from previous messages that some of Lego's colors didn't physically exist. Out of curiosity, does anyone know why Lego is defining colors they haven't actually produced? Allen (15 years ago, 19-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDraw.org 2009-02 Parts Update Now Available
|
| (...) It's wonderful to see all these fabulous parts released! Thanks for all the hard work. I am also very happy to see the TLG colors separated out into another reference file rather than being included in the official color list. That makes their (...) (15 years ago, 18-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
