To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 16239 (-10)
  LDDP current version - BUG?
 
I just came across the following problem. For part (URL) LDDP generate 2 error regarding planarity. Planarcheck does not. Anybody with similar experience? cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 30-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Looking for dimensions of LEGO bricks.
 
In lugnet.cad, Michael Horvath wrote: <SNIP> (...) Yes, the original design was British, so used imperial units. Chris (17 years ago, 25-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Suggestion: !TYPE line
 
(...) Sounds logical, but if we would have that in this way we just could go and hard color the part. At this point you should not be so narrow to the real part. In our part files there should be only the geometric data defined. The color is defined (...) (17 years ago, 29-May-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
 
  Suggestion: !TYPE line
 
LEGO parts may vary in colour and pattern, but they are always of the same material. For example, there is no such thing as a Technic Axle 7 made of rubber or the Axle Flexible 7 that's solid, is there? Here I got an idea: have parts identify what (...) (17 years ago, 29-May-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
 
  Re: Looking for dimensions of LEGO bricks.
 
(...) I was aware of the Kiddiecraft connection, and that TLC bought all the remaining rights from them at some point, but I thought the original Automatic Binding Bricks were a legally licensed copy/variation of the Kiddiecraft bricks. If they (...) (17 years ago, 28-May-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
 
  Re: Looking for dimensions of LEGO bricks.
 
(...) That's hardly some freak coincidence. The original 1949 Lego brick was an unauthorized copy of the Kiddicraft Self-Locking Building Brick, invented by an Englishman named Hilary Page. When the Christiansens got samples of them from the British (...) (17 years ago, 28-May-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
 
  Re: Looking for dimensions of LEGO bricks.
 
(...) Center-to-center, of course. The stud diameters differ by 0.028 between the drawings too, creating a diff of the gaps of 0.046 (but the length of the parts are exactly the same). (...) Well, the drawings are of parts, not molds (and the parts (...) (17 years ago, 27-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Looking for dimensions of LEGO bricks.
 
(...) That much? Wow. I figured the distance between two studs should be closer to 3mm, since a LEGO tile is (in theory) 3.2mm thick, and it will sorta fit between two studs. Or were you refering to the center-to-center distance? Anyways, one thing (...) (17 years ago, 27-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Looking for dimensions of LEGO bricks.
 
(...) I'm not at liberty to say too much, but I have actually looked at three real drawings of LEGO parts, and not even TLC seems to be sure what the dimensions should be - I've seen the distance between two studs dimensioned as 8 mm on one part and (...) (17 years ago, 26-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Looking for dimensions of LEGO bricks.
 
(...) I tried the experimental approach, built a long line of 23 x Technic beams 16 assembled with plates and measure the total length: 2937mm With 8mm distance between studs, the theoretical value is 2944mm, error is -0.23% With 5/16" distance (...) (17 years ago, 26-May-09, to lugnet.cad)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR