 | | Re: Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Hi Chris, Thanks for the news. I should not be surprised that you are on top of this. I understand the drawing the line in the sand. 2009-02 sounds great. Thanks, Kevin (16 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
|
(...) Many of the Technic "beams" got re-cycled through the Parts Tracker in 2009-01 for primitive optimisation and BFC reasons. I took the opportunity to implement something that we had been talking about for some time - to name these types of (...) (16 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
|
Hi gang, I want to start by saying thanks to all those involved in creating parts and managing the parts library. We toolsmiths would not have a job if it were'nt for the LDraw parts library. I have a question about naming conventions with respect (...) (16 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part naming and hard colored parts
|
|
(...) Sergio From the complete library update that was 2008-01, the !LDRAW_ORG line (line 4 of every file) should tell you what you need to know. Full details are in the header specification at (URL) Generic colour parts have an identifier of "Part" (...) (16 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Part naming and hard colored parts
|
|
Hi everybody, as many of you already know, I'm the programmer of SR 3D Builder. Using the lDraw prebuild library has been for me the starting point for developing my application, but as things become complex I have to assume some convention in my (...) (16 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | DATHeader NEW as .NET application (version 2.0.1)
|
|
Version 2.0.1 of DATHeader is now available for download at www.michael-heidemann.de as my other webspace is down :-( in the moment. There are now more tests performed. For example: - check for coplanarity (based on Philo's code) - check for double (...) (16 years ago, 17-May-09, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader next release as DOTNET application
|
|
(...) As it seems that nobody needs a version of DATHeader that run under W98 I will close the version that I have developed with Visual Basic 5. The new version is on the way and I hope to release it this weekend. I am testing it currently against (...) (16 years ago, 15-May-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2009-01 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) Sure, just use the complete zip format version: (URL) - (URL) (16 years ago, 15-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2009-01 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
Can it be installed without having Ldraw 2008 parts ? Im a mac user Thx in advance (16 years ago, 15-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | DATHeader next release as DOTNET application
|
|
As I am going to switch DATHeader from Visual Basic 5 to Visual Basic Express 2005 I want to know if somebody that uses currently DATHeader has not the possibility to use the new coming version! The new version requires the .NET-Framework 2.0 or (...) (16 years ago, 14-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
