 | | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
|
(...) Sorry Matt but this is cheap. Everyone who has the skills to author a part has all that's needed to review one. Instead of blaiming the reviewers go and ask for review rights - it might takes hours to review a part but it takes less than (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts [DAT]
|
|
(...) Allen, I agree with you and would go a step further: I cannot see any benefit to have alias parts for transparent and opaque parts, but all this is the territory of the PT admins and I'm not going to mess around in their corner of the sandbox. (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
|
(...) Amen! Preach it Brother Allen! I agree with you on all fronts. In the good news department - a part I first submitted 3 1/2 years ago (40375) finally got certified this weekend. But the pace of output for this stuff in painfully slow, and (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, I missed this discussion and haven't stumbled on the magic search phrase to dig it up again. It strikes me that creating hard-colored parts for every part/color permutation Lego ever has or ever will produce has a number of (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
|
(...) I couldn't find anything revelant by searching LUGNET, but I do see sense in this... though if enough numbers were found, parts/ directory one day would contain more of PC parts rather than real parts. Wouldn't it make more sense to at least (...) (17 years ago, 12-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
|
(...) We had discussion about this several times (Please search Lugnet). Because TLG uses these days the colored numbers in the instructions, we try to bring also this number to the user. The AIOI lets you choose to install these parts or not. I (...) (17 years ago, 11-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Purpose of physical colour parts
|
|
What are the physical colour parts such as (URL) this one> for? Wouldn't it be more disk-space saving to rather have a list of coloured part numbers? I have my hands on quite a lot of them through building instructions, and I think that if one made (...) (17 years ago, 11-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part title suggestions
|
|
(...) 48989 vs 55615 - I agree that the names should be more similar 30244 vs. 2412b and 54200 vs. 50746 - This is contrary to what has been agreed before. Where this exists in the existing official library (e.g. 2456 vs. 44237, 3960 vs. 30065) we (...) (17 years ago, 10-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part title suggestions
|
|
(...) Thank you very much for pointing on that. We should have all a quick look at the mentioned issues, as all the parts are currently on the PT and everybody (who has reviewer rights) should comment for this. In general I agree to all three items (...) (17 years ago, 9-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Part title suggestions
|
|
Hi again, thought to voice my opinion on some parts' titles: (URL) 48989> and (URL) 55615> are obviously similar parts, however they have totally different titles. Even they seem like pin joiners to me, as there are no axleholes on either part, just (...) (17 years ago, 9-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
