Subject:
|
Re: Playing with LDLite COLOR
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 07:12:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1033 times
|
| |
|
|
Jacob,
The FAQ item looks like it has a typo. The three letter extension for
ldlite files should be "ldl" not "ldlite".
"... Most people prefer to use three letter extensions, so the LDLite
line should probably read:
AddType application/x-ldlite ldlite"
-gyug
ps. Very nice use of footnotes, BTW.
Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> 3) <URL:http://hugin.risoe.dk/JJ_Memorial/FAQ/#question-32>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Playing with LDLite COLOR
|
| Paul: (...) Thanks. It's fixed. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Playing with LDLite COLOR
|
| Bram: Your web server returns Content-type: application/x-ldraw for both the LDraw file[1] and the MPD file[2]. This is ok, but I suggest that you differentiate between LDraw, MPD, and LDLite files[3]. Play well, Jacob 1) <URL:(URL) 2) <URL:(URL) 3) (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
