Subject:
|
Re: Microfig vs. Nanofig (Was: Nanofig Ties)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 10 Apr 1999 04:54:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
715 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Ryan Dennett writes:
> Well acording to my science book
Consulting a book?!? With pages and words and stuff? Is that allowed? :-,
> and then if you wanted=
> a nanofig stardestroyer all you'd have to do would be use a 2x1 plate :)
Wow, talk about minimalist! Yeah, it's gotta be a pretty loose scale.
Cheers,
- jsproat
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
"The world will not perish for want of wonders but for want of wonder"
-- British scientist J. B. S. Haldane (1892-1964)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Microfig vs. Nanofig (Was: Nanofig Ties)
|
| Well acording to my science book the building scales should go more like minifig(or just plain fig) down to millifig(which would have been microfig), and then to microfig(which was nanofig), and then if you wanted a nanofig stardestroyer all you'd (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
