 | | Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
|
|
(...) Since the discussion you linked contained much debate about the derivative status of rendered images, I'd like to know if anyone wearing a SteerCo hat can confirm my conclusion. "Commercial sale of instruction images rendered from LDraw models (...) (18 years ago, 19-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
|
|
(...) Yes. The purpose of my post was to have them answered again, up-to-date and in direct response to the ideas I set forth. (...) The readme suggests that rendered images are not considered derivative works. Since an instruction booklet consists (...) (18 years ago, 19-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
|
|
Hi Jim, some of these questions have been answered before. This is a bit lengthy: (URL) all boils down to this final policy: (URL) version will be shipped with the new CA-Library) We also had a similar discussion quite recently: (URL) for copyright (...) (18 years ago, 19-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
|
|
(...) My and other LDraw part authors' work are used in sites like BrickLink to promote LEGO parts for sale. No problems with me. Using my LDraw parts in sold instructions doesn't bother me either. Selling software with my work included does not (...) (18 years ago, 17-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
|
|
Hi! Here are three questions: one about LEGO trademarks and two for the LDraw community. The questions stem from a casual interest in selling custom LEGO kits with instructions. Because there are existing vendors of excellent such kits - and books (...) (18 years ago, 17-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
