 | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ??? —Willy Tschager
|
| | | (...) than we should start thinking about the switch to LDView as render engine ... if this is technically doable. to be frank I didn't understand a single word from all the tech speech above: x server or not, OSMesa a mess ... Travis, I guess you (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ??? —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | | (...) I would need access to the server, yes. I think that if Xvnc were installed on the server, LDView could connect to that, and everything would then be happy. (Xvnc is an X Server that's designed to be connected to remotely via vnc. From (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ??? —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | | (...) I just did a quick check on my own Linux box (a virtual machine, actually) with xvfb (X Virtual Frame Buffer), and that worked fine with LDView. Since xvfb is a standard part of the X distribution, it should be easy to install on most major (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ??? —Don Heyse
|
| | | | (...) Yeah we experimented with xvfb many years ago. (URL) was some weirdness with the aspect ratio that was probably caused by a bug in ldglite at the time. And there were some questions about large image sizes, but it should be a viable solution (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
