 | | Accountability of "Key Positions": Call for Public Discussion and Consensus —Willy Tschager
|
| | | Hi folks, We know that you would prefer reading about new parts updates announcements instead of politics and bureaucratics, but unfortunately those things also have to be done and decided on in order to ensure the smooth running of LDraw.org. As (...) (17 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce) !
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Accountability of "Key Positions": Call for Public Discussion and Consensus —Michael Heidemann
|
| | | | | Willy Tschager schrieb: (...) snip (...) snip (...) I agree overall to your thoughts. This is a good step for the future. We should bring this point in a fast way to go. Michael Heidemann (17 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Accountability of "Key Positions": Call for Public Discussion and Consensus —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Hi Willy, I agree with these additions. Just some minor changes: 6.08: "about appointments of new ones" -> "about new appointments" 6.10: "otherwise unable to fulfill" -> "otherwise unable to fulfill his or her duties" (repetetive but I think (...) (17 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Accountability of "Key Positions": Call for Public Discussion and Consensus —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | | | While it's implied in the current text, I think you should make it expicit that "firing" someone requires 3 of the 5 SteerCo members to vote in favor of "firing" that person. --Travis (17 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Accountability of "Key Positions" - updated version —Willy Tschager
|
| | | | Many thx for your input! Find below a revised version of the motion. Please note this has not gone through the SteerCo and is proposed solely by me in an attempt to move on from this issue as quickly as possible. w. ---...--- Beginning of motion (...) (17 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Accountability of "Key Positions" - updated version —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) to get pedantic (likewise not via SteerCo) I think this may be better (change is in bold or square brackets) Section 6.09: Removal of Key Positions Key Positions are accountable to the Steering Committee and might be removed if someone fails (...) (17 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Accountability of "Key Positions" - updated version —Willy Tschager
|
| | | | (...) hmm ... as you might know Italy is going through a new cabinet crises (again) and faces new elections and the risk to be governed by mr. conflict of interest himself (read: berlusconi). what about the conflict of interest if the key position (...) (17 years ago, 22-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Accountability of "Key Positions" - updated version —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) I think LDraw politics are a litle more tame than Italy's ;) I don't think that would be a problem. I would hope that for it to happen the situation would have to be so bad that it would be unanimous (apart from in this type of situation which (...) (17 years ago, 22-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
