Subject:
|
Re: Question for the LSC. Blanks in file names legal?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:42:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1196 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
| |
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
| |
- Backslash (\) is used as the delimiter in path names.
|
You might want to take a look at 2593.dat (including the author ;-). (In
your defense, that’s a really old file.)
|
Yah, I think that was the first official part with sub-part files.
| |
Having said that, most places in the parts library, backslash (\) is used as
the delimiter in path names. However, there are some parts (2593.dat
included) that use forward slash (/). DOS and Windows don’t care. Other
operating systems have to convert all the backslashes to forward slashes (an
extremely minor thing, especially when compared to supporting the
case-insensitive clause).
I would suggest either explicitly stating that both are allowed, or thinking
about updating those parts in the parts library that use forward slash.
|
I’d lean toward updating the files with ‘s/’ references to ‘s\’. The PT is
definitely coded toward using only backslashes.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Question for the LSC. Blanks in file names legal?
|
| (...) You might want to take a look at 2593.dat (including the author ;-). (In your defense, that's a really old file.) Having said that, most places in the parts library, backslash (\) is used as the delimiter in path names. However, there are some (...) (20 years ago, 6-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
