Subject:
|
Re: Question for the LSC. Blanks in file names legal?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:25:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1035 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> Is it legal to have blanks in file names in type 1 records?
>
> I looked at
>
> http://www.ldraw.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=45
>
> and it does not specify. I'd guess that LDRAW.EXE cannot handle them.
>
> What is the LSC's position on this issue.
>
> Kevin
As a followup question, at first read/reread, the document is a bit confusing.
The term "line" is overloaded. In one case line means, text as it would be
viewed on a terminal, and in the other it is a graphical representation of what
mathemeticians call line segments.
As it reads we have triangle lines, quad lines, line lines, and conditional line
lines. Is it just my dyslexic mind, or is this a bit confusing to others?
Can we choose a different word for the textual representation of said things?
Maybe text records?
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Question for the LSC. Blanks in file names legal?
|
| (...) It's not just you. Is the new version of the spec better? It still carries the overloaded definition, but it doesn't rely on it as heavily. The new version of the spec is at: (URL) Can we choose a different word for the textual representation (...) (20 years ago, 5-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
