To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 12402
12401  |  12403
Subject: 
Re: Visio and Picture formats (was New Parts Drawings - Plates, Slope, Track Pieces)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:18:18 GMT
Viewed: 
1215 times
  
"Mark Bellis" <mark.bellis@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in
news:IBGoCB.23B3@lugnet.com:

I did a test with the 4x4 round plate drawing:
monochrome bitmap is 34KB
jpeg is 66KB
png is 63KB but loses definition
gif is 13KB
In this case the jpeg is larger than the bitmap, which is why I posted
the bitmap.  I haven't yet investigated GIFs or PNGs, so perhaps you
could tell me: Is GIF the standard highest compression, lowest loss
format? If so, why doesn't everyone use them? I've seen animation in
GIFs - how do you do that? What are PNGs used for, since they lose
definition? Are GIFs or PNGs any more vulnerable to viruses than jpegs
or bitmaps?

Could you post an example of a PNG that 'loses definition,' please? I
think you must be doing something wrong there, since PNG is a lossless
format. What program did you use to convert it?

GIF is not a very good format, IMO, because for one it's encumbered by
patents (it's not free to use), and it's limited to 256 colours. JPG
offers full colour, but is lossy, while PNG offers the best of all
worlds: full colour (fine for photographs), lossless (fine for line
drawings), great compression and it's patent-free.

Koyan



1 Message in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR