Subject:
|
Re: Overlapping lines (type 2)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Dec 2003 02:24:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1733 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Niels Karsdorp wrote:
> A question for the more experienced part authors:
>
> Is it permitted to have lines (linetype 2) overlap, caused by
> adjecent primitives (e.g. two rect or rect and box primitives)?
This isn't 'forbidden' or anything.
But, because of the way renderers calculate lines & edges, this type of arrangement
might lead to 'edge noise' -- occasional doubling of sections of the line.
For the few number of lines involved, I'd look into just using direct lines &
polygons, rather than rect primitives.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Overlapping lines (type 2)
|
| (...) Another example is the motor cutout of several old train baseplates. These have 12 sides and 36 edges, but can also be created with 3 box3u2p primitives and having overlapping 4 edges. Or should I create another box3 primitive with two more (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Overlapping lines (type 2)
|
| A question for the more experienced part authors: Is it permitted to have lines (linetype 2) overlap, caused by adjecent primitives (e.g. two rect or rect and box primitives)? Niels (23 years ago, 1-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
