Subject:
|
Re: Att: Steffen
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:51:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
503 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> In http://www.ldraw.org//cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/39cc01.dat you wrote:
> > Hmm. That posting comment frightens me. But I'll go for it.
> > I had nothing to say there because I joined this exclusive club later.
> > And now I don't find the discussion. So here you go. Flames not welcome.
>
> It didn't take me ten seconds to spot the thread. I just searched lugned.cad for
> "classic windows"
> http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/parts/?n=4413
>
> I wrote this comment in total frustration because *nothing* happened to my parts
> in the PT. So I tried a new way; to have the discussion first, outside the PT in
> which I can't participate, trying to avoid 200 updated versions and name changes
> etc etc. Apperantly, this method was no better. After nine months and still no
> problems discoveed, the file gets its first certify vote. With this pace, it may
> be approved in three or four years time? No matter what I do, I just know I
> can't win.
I've got the same feeling, too.
But recently I got a few notifications of reviews of some of my parts.
I know for some parts it will take long, because I have uploaded several 'rare'
parts, that many reviewers might not have, but I still keep making such parts.
One of my latest creations (part x280c01) is already used on Peeron (as part
x555c01), so it gets a good use even long before it is certified.
Niels
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Att: Steffen
|
| (...) It didn't take me ten seconds to spot the thread. I just searched lugned.cad for "classic windows" (URL) wrote this comment in total frustration because *nothing* happened to my parts in the PT. So I tried a new way; to have the discussion (...) (21 years ago, 8-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
