 | | Using parts in p\48\ (was: part 2951, more questions, nearly done) [DAT]
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: --snip snip-- (...) the (...) -snip- (...) (I (...) exist (...) -snipalot- Hmmm I feared that much:) So I've just finished the calculations, and are about to punch numbers again:) BUT, there's one large problem (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Filenaming Standard Change?
|
|
(...) before we decided for sure to go to MPD and the submodel names we decided to go with. Like Todd said, that format easily crumbles, but we are now talking about the name for only the complete set's file. (...) What I'd really like to see is it (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number for crystal in Rock Raider sets?
|
|
(...) I would like to know if anyone agrees that this part is number 70770. I found this description on Lutz's list, "70770 Aquazone Crystal Chrome". (URL) Easter (25 years ago, 15-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | An idea for anyone
|
|
Can anyone make a lego .dat bycicle or motorbike. (25 years ago, 15-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | OMR Filenaming Standard Change?
|
|
In some recent discussion with Ryan Dennett on creating some resources for the OMR, he brought up what he felt was a discrepancy in the file naming convention. We discussed this and felt it appropriate to approach the group to see if 1) we should go (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
