 | | Re: Datsville Rev039 - Micro Update
|
|
(...) That's really great news, Mike! I like all your ideas and I give you quite free hands. And if there isn't anything I absolutely can't accept, I'll include your changes in "my" future unofficial versions of Datsville. How about a shared Dropbox (...) (13 years ago, 9-Sep-11, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Datsville Rev039 - Micro Update
|
|
(...) I have some time on hand that I plan to spend on Datsville. Mainly some organizational things and a few tweaks. I will use your revision as a basis. I think it would be cool to solicit submissions from users of LDD as well as LDraw, for (...) (13 years ago, 8-Sep-11, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Confusion with LPUB and LDView
|
|
Ciao Gerald, wir sind nach: (URL) Bitte dort noch einmal posten. w. LDraw Webmaster (13 years ago, 7-Sep-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Confusion with LPUB and LDView
|
|
Hello, I have been using different versions of LPUB and LDview in the past without issues. Also the most recent ones, LPub V4.0.0.11 along with LDView 4, were working in the past (till 2 month ago) without issues. Now I tried to render another (...) (13 years ago, 7-Sep-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Request (92906)
|
|
Hi Eric, Done! (URL) (...) Indeed, it was not so easy! (...) Scaled-up 32019 is a very good mock-up, but 92912 has 30 patterns on its track, vs. 36 for 32019... Philo PS: Perhaps you should move to the new (URL) LDraw forum>? (13 years ago, 5-Sep-11, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
