 | | Re: Straightening Up the MPD Format
|
|
(...) At the very least it works in MLCAD. I frequently use this to keep parts and subparts in the same file while authoring (87751.dat and s\87751.dat within an MPD file for instance). -Santeri (15 years ago, 2-Apr-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Straightening Up the MPF Format
|
|
(...) Please see here for the search strategie for referenced files: (URL) present your problem can only be solved by hand to give all files in the MPD file a unique name. I do not know any app so far that will assist you in that. So far I do not (...) (15 years ago, 2-Apr-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Straightening Up the MPD Format
|
|
(...) I have been faced with this problem some time ago at my application MPDCenter. I had nearly the same idea but I decided to use "&&" to combine the files that should be in the same file because I do not expect any filename to contain "&&". (...) (15 years ago, 2-Apr-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Straightening Up the MPD Format
|
|
(...) I am not sure this is really necessary. The two "door.ldr" model must reside in different folders, so if you encode relative path in file name it should work (not tested with current tools though...) Philo (15 years ago, 2-Apr-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Straightening Up the MPF Format
|
|
Maybe it's time to straighten up the MPD standard. In (URL) it says: "So far, there are no clear scoping or namespace rules on MPD files. If you put a file named stud.dat in your MPD file, don't be surprised to see your stud.dat file appear on the (...) (15 years ago, 2-Apr-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
