 | | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 3.0.5
|
|
(...) I have fixed that problem. It has been in the xmpd.dll version 2.2.1. Now version 2.2.2 is in the download package at (URL) and detecting double lines is working again. Sorry for that trouble. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 31-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDForge - dev. plans and call for help
|
|
(...) The polygons have to be painted on the screen in the correct order in order to have the part displayed correctly. It's not handled automatically. So I need an algorithm to sort the polygons.. and my current one doesn't work right. -Santeri (15 years ago, 31-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDForge - dev. plans and call for help
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) -SNIP- At present I can not see the reason to sort polygons if you only want to display them. cu mikeheide (...) (15 years ago, 31-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDForge - dev. plans and call for help
|
|
Hi folks, over the latter half of the year 2009 I've been planning and experimenting on the thought of a good CAD program for part authors. Now I'm unveiling my thoughts to the public, but this is not an announcement. It's too early for such. (...) (15 years ago, 31-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 3.0.5
|
|
(...) Please stop downloading this version as it has a bug in detecting double lines. I am working on that bug and hope to release today updated version. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 31-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 3.0.5
|
|
(...) Yes, if you are the admin, then this is correct. But there are still people out there that do not have admin privilegs. Otherwise if I thought about that in deep it does not make sense as I do not deliver any installer anymore. I think with (...) (15 years ago, 29-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 3.0.5
|
|
(...) Good point (well, maybe, I just updated to XP from win2k...). But since latest Datheader versions are delivered as a zip, then updating the program needs exactly the same permissions as updating the data files??? Philo (15 years ago, 29-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 3.0.5
|
|
(...) As this a time consumption feature that is new, I thought it would be best to first leave that out and if you like you can save your preference. For best viewing there is still LDView.exe where you could have a closer look to the part. (...) (...) (15 years ago, 29-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 3.0.5
|
|
(...) I did, but didn't restart Datheader after. It works now. Is there a good reason not to check the box by default on the first run? (...) Well... I don't think so. Imho the best way is to include the file in the zip and by default use current (...) (15 years ago, 29-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 3.0.5
|
|
(...) Did you check the "use internal viewer" checkbox in the preferences dialog? (...) Because you have the possibility to put the list files wherever you want (please see preferences dialog). This way it is much easier for newbies. (I hope). cu (...) (15 years ago, 28-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 3.0.5
|
|
One problem and one question: - The viewer window remains desperately empty, is there something special to do? - Why don't you add the primitives scale file also in the zip? Philo (15 years ago, 28-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 3.0.5
|
|
Today I have released the new version 3.0.5.0 of DATHeader. Sorry for all linux guys, it does not work under MONO. For all other it might be worth to have a look to the new features. You will find the details and a download link on (URL) (15 years ago, 28-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
--snip-- (...) The Flickr group gets a bit active when I cross-post discussion threads from here to it. There are people that don't use LUGNET but do use Flickr that do like to talk about LDraw. However LUGNET is definitely the central place for it. (...) (15 years ago, 26-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) To my knowledge, this is really the only place to discuss LDraw in a manner other than 'check out my MOC in LDraw'. All, or nearly all of the developers (and hopefully future developers) are here. LUGNET also contains the searchable history of (...) (15 years ago, 26-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) gotta confess to some lurking, here. i'm a frequent user of ldraw and visitor to lugnet. i'm very interested to see where this discussion goes and VERY curious to know what sites are taking the place of lugnet (i 'get' the sites that have all (...) (15 years ago, 25-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | SR 3D Builder 0.5.0.1 released
|
|
Hi again, I apologize for continue new messages, but I had to quick release the new version of the application in order to fix a huge bug preventing about 200 or more parts from being displayed in the toolbox. So here we are with version 0.5.0.1. (...) (15 years ago, 25-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Does LDD's LDraw importer actually work?
|
|
(...) <steps to use LDD to import under Winders> (...) I can do it. ;-) I got to meet the architect for LDD at Brickcon. Consider it done. :) -- joshuaD (15 years ago, 25-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Re: Does LDD's LDraw importer actually work?
|
|
(...) Thanks Joshua. This is what I wanted to hear. I figured out what the problem is. The Mac version of LDD expects imported LDraw files to have Unix line endings (LF), and silently fails if the line endings are in another format. Ironically, it (...) (15 years ago, 25-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.ldd, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
Wow. It's been a while since a thread here broke the 100 dot limit I think... ROSCO (15 years ago, 25-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) Lugnet would need to be simpler... It can't compete with modern social networks and user friendly picture-hosting websites. Basically, that would imply A LOT of work while keeping everything free... (15 years ago, 24-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
