 | | Re: LSynth 3 available on kclague.net
|
|
(...) That's a relief! How odd that this doesn't appear to affect others Thanks Owen. (15 years ago, 4-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth 3 available on kclague.net
|
|
(...) I don't think anyone ever made a linux executable available, but it should be easy to build it from the sources. So I'll try to package up a source tarball to match the next release once it's out. (15 years ago, 4-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDRAW color question
|
|
(...) Can anyone answer the question above? Specifically I would like to know how you use the new colours in MLCad? Thanks Tim (15 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) This type of primitive would mostly be used in places where a cylinder appears between two other objects. One example would be the subpart at: (URL) currently uses 4-4cylc.dat where a 4-4cylo.dat (cylinder with edges open at both ends) would (...) (15 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth 3 available on kclague.net
|
|
(...) Llooking forward to 3.1 I've seen there are at least two Mac OS X builds of LSynth available. Is there also a Linux version anywhere? Jetro (15 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) Guess I replied way too soon. I may revise my earlier reply after giving it some more thought. A 1/4 cylinder with both ends closed would of course be better for rounded cornerns. A cylinder with both ends open could be useful when making (...) (15 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth 3 available on kclague.net
|
|
(...) The good news is that your head is ok. The bad news is that it appears as if some band synthesis debugging code managed to sneak into the 3.0 release of lsynth. Fortunately a 3.1 release is in the works, due real soon now... If you really, (...) (15 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth 3 available on kclague.net [DAT]
|
|
(...) Everything is fine here: 0 Untitled 0 Name: LSynthtest.ldr 0 Author: Owen Dive 0 Unofficial Model 0 SYNTH BEGIN RUBBER_BAND 2 0 SYNTH SHOW 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION CONFIG 0 0 0 MLCAD HIDE 1 7 132 -16 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 (...) (15 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 4 Callouts (and other questions)
|
|
(...) How about a redraw when dragging the assembly? Jaco (15 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | 2009/2010 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) - Call for Nominations
|
|
Hi folks, it has passed another year since the last election of the LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) were held - and again the SteerCo missed the actual deadlines :-( Nominations are now open. All nominations must be received and recorded by (...) (15 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) 4-4 and 2-4 cylc are released, 1-4 and 3-4cylc are already on PT. (...) I think the usefulness is quite low indeed. Philo (15 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth 3 available on kclague.net [DAT]
|
|
(...) Hi there. I've spent the last few days upgrading to the new version of LSynth, and I've come across some things that are just wierd. Something seems to be going wrong with band-type syntheses - an example will best demonstrate: I have the (...) (15 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) A cylinder with one closed end (4-4cylc.dat) was issued in the latest parts update (2009-02). See (URL) . If there is a need for a 1-4cylc.dat, feel free to submit it to the Parts Tracker. However, I'm struggling to see the utility of a (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) Naming is not an important issue to me. Either name would be fine for me. The one important thing for me is that it doesn't mess up with renderers and utilities that make primitive substitutions. But I don't see that there should be any risk (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(...) Seems OK to me, but I don't like "circular" too much. Rounded, perhaps? Philo (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(...) Hmm.. maybe I should really think another three dozen times more about what I propose. 32174.dat - Technic Ball Socket Single 3 x 2 Circular 47296.dat - Technic Ball Socket Single 3 x 2 Rectangular 47296.dat - Technic Ball Socket Double 5 x 2 (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) Not being a part author, I can't comment on the utility, but to me the naming is confusing. The base cylinder primitives are already open at both ends; they just don't have edges there. So to me, cyle would make more since in the filename, and (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(...) I think it's a bad idea to have the double-socket parts be named so similarly to the single-socket parts. The double-socket parts are beams with sockets on either end, whereas the single socket parts are sockets with connectors out the (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(URL) Hi all - I'm currently working on the rectangular ball joint sockets and the naming issue (which I have tried to rise up a couple of times) is to me becoming a little critical. What I'd like is to unify the titles of all seven variants: the (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 4 Callouts (and other questions)
|
|
(...) There is no support in LPub for the case where the assembly image is larger than the page. Sorry. Kevin (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
