 | | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) Not being a part author, I can't comment on the utility, but to me the naming is confusing. The base cylinder primitives are already open at both ends; they just don't have edges there. So to me, cyle would make more since in the filename, and (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(...) I think it's a bad idea to have the double-socket parts be named so similarly to the single-socket parts. The double-socket parts are beams with sockets on either end, whereas the single socket parts are sockets with connectors out the (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(URL) Hi all - I'm currently working on the rectangular ball joint sockets and the naming issue (which I have tried to rise up a couple of times) is to me becoming a little critical. What I'd like is to unify the titles of all seven variants: the (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 4 Callouts (and other questions)
|
|
(...) There is no support in LPub for the case where the assembly image is larger than the page. Sorry. Kevin (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Bricksmith 2.3
|
|
(...) (snip) (...) Cool! I haven't become a power user of Bricksmith just yet, but have adopted this and LPub to create some of the instructions that are in BrickJournal. Many thanks from me and the readership of the magazine for your and Kevin's (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
